PROBLEM The patient is a 59-year-old male smoker who presents to the office with fever and cough. The chest x-ray film reveals no
infiltrates, but the radiologist notes a 9-mm nodule in the right lower lobe.
APPROACH A solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) is defined as a lung parenchymal lesion less than 3 cm in diameter. These nodules, identified
in approximately 150,000 patients each year, are malignant in 10% to 70% of cases. If an SPN is malignant, the physician must
make an early, accurate diagnosis because the 5-year prognosis after resection is 70% (compared with a 5-year prognosis of
10%-15% for all patients with lung cancer).
 TABLE 1.Solitary pulmonary nodule: Differential diagnosis
|
Many factors influence the probability that a lung nodule is malignant: size, change in size, calcification appearance, age,
smoking history, airflow obstruction, and certain occupations. Increasing size favors cancer. A lesion that doubles (increases
its diameter by 25%) in less than a month is less likely to be benign. Eccentric calcification or a spiculated appearance
on chest radiographs is more consistent with malignancy. Asbestos workers have a 3 to 5 times greater risk of lung cancer
than the population at large—a risk that is greatly magnified by smoking. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease poses an additional
risk. In addition to malignancy, there are many other diagnoses to consider (see Table 1).
EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT The first step is to determine whether the SPN is definitely located in the lung parenchyma. Is it a nipple shadow, a soft
tissue mass, or an object of clothing? Once the nodule is determined to be intraparenchymal, the next step is to figure out
whether the nodule is old or new by reviewing previous x-ray films. If a nodule has not changed in 2 years, it is almost always
benign. The next question to ask is whether the nodule is single or multiple. CT evaluation will provide the answer. The presence
of more than 6 nodules suggests granulomatous disease; the presence of 2 to 6 nodules is worrisome for metastatic disease.
Once a true, solitary nodule is identified, the diagnostic approach involves consideration of the patient's risk factors for
cancer, comorbid conditions, surgical risk, patient preference, and the skills of the surgeon and radiologist. Nodule size
is also a significant factor. Nodules less than 5 mm in diameter are not commonly associated with cancer. However, uncertainty
exists in the literature regarding the best approach to these small nodules. Patients with the greatest risk for lung cancer
may require follow-up CT scans. Nodules larger than 1 cm, especially in moderate- to high-risk patients, should be considered
for transthoracic needle aspiration or surgical resection. Nodules of 5 to 9 mm in diameter are usually too small to aspirate.
Ordering serial CT scans every 3 months for 1 year, and then every 6 months for the following year, is a reasonable approach
for these nodules. Nodules that increase in size require aspiration or resection.
Positron-emission tomography (PET) is becoming increasingly available for the evaluation of lung nodules. PET imaging involves
the uptake of 18F-fludeoxyglucose (cancer cells have greater metabolic activity and thus have greater uptake of this molecule).
PET may be useful in patients who refuse needle aspiration or in the evaluation of nodules that are difficult to biopsy. PET
can also identify occult mediastinal metastases in the presence of a normal CT scan of the mediastinum. PET is not useful,
however, in nodules smaller than 1 cm. False-positive results can occur with infection and inflammation (PET sensitivity is
approximately 97% and its specificity, 78%).
The patient had a CT scan that revealed an SPN in the right lower lobe. The nodule was new and too small for PET scanning
or biopsy. He understood that his age and smoking history placed him at high risk for lung cancer, but he did not want surgery.
He elected to have serial CT scans performed, the next one to be scheduled in 3 months. He was also treated for acute bronchitis.
What would you do if . . . 1. The patient's nodule increases in size to 12 mm in 3 months?
2. The nodule remains unchanged after 2 years of serial CT scans?
Answers 1. This is a 25% increase in diameter, indicating that the nodule has doubled in volume. This makes cancer very likely. The
patient requires needle aspiration to permit a diagnosis, or he must proceed directly to surgery.
2. Most nodules are benign if they do not change over a 2-year period. Discuss this fact with the patient. If he is at high
risk or anxious about forgoing further radiologic evaluation, consider continuation of serial CT scans.