HealingWell.com - Community, Information, Resources
HOME  |  DISEASES & CONDITIONS  |  VIDEOS  |  FORUMS & CHAT  |  RESOURCES  |  NEWSLETTER  |  BOOKSTORE  |  JOIN
WHAT'S NEW  |  SUBMIT SITE  |  DONATE  |  HW SHOP  |  ADVERTISE  |  ABOUT US  |  EMAIL  |  SEARCH
 
Search Site:    
Search Archives:      




Return to Topic Area:
Welcome Page
 
Search
 E-Mail to a colleague
Modern Medicine - A New Resource for Busy Physicians & Healthcare Professionals
Click Here to Learn More

Make way for a new era of insulin therapy
Source: Drug Topics Supplements
By: Paul Wynn
Originally published: October 10, 2005

Insulin therapies have evolved to the point where Drs. Frederick Banting and Charles Best would hardly recognize their own discovery. With the advent of modern recombinant DNA technology, scientists have developed insulin analogs that better mimic the body's normal insulin action. Now, more predictable basal and bolus insulin therapies help achieve tighter glucose control.

New insulin products will be reaching pharmacies over the next few months. The first to hit the market by the end of the year will be the rapid-acting insulin Apidra (insulin glulisine, Sanofi-Aventis). The long-acting insulin Levemir (insulin detemir, Novo Nordisk), cleared by the Food & Drug Administration in June, is expected to be available in the first half of next year.

The evolution of insulin is far from over, however. Several promising needle-free therapies, such as inhaled insulin, are in development, and the first inhalable, rapid-acting insulin, Exubera (insulin [rDNA origin] powder for oral inhalation, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis), is inching closer to market after a positive recommendation to the FDA in September from an expert committee. Another inhaled insulin product, jointly developed by Eli Lilly and Alkermes, has begun phase III studies.

Diabetes experts speculate that perhaps the future will bring implantable chips that release insulin, or maybe there will be insulin pumps that automatically activate according to the body's need to avoid hypoglycemia.

"The goal in insulin therapy is to mimic nature's insulin pattern; the risk is hypoglycemia. The more you try for optimal control, the more risk of hypoglycemia, and, therefore, the more you need the most precise tools," said Scott Drab, Pharm.D., assistant professor of pharmaceutical sciences at the University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy.

With the "designer insulin" therapies offering significant benefits, pharmacists seldom dispense older, longer-acting insulin or the pork-based insulin products anymore. As a result, Lilly announced in July the discontinuation of four insulin agents: Humulin U Ultralente, Humulin L Lente, Regular Iletin II, and NPH Iletin II. The company expects that the products will be available in pharmacies until the end of 2005.

"Over the past few decades there has been a great deal of innovation in insulin therapy, such as rapid-acting analogs, analog mixtures, basal analogs, and other human insulin products and formulations," said Lilly's Scott Jacober, M.D. "As a result, we've seen a significant and steady decline in usage of the products we're discontinuing as doctors continue to move their patients towards newer therapies." In a Dear Doctor letter about Humulin U and Humulin L, Lilly stated that "use of these longer-acting insulins has declined by more than 70% over the past five years due to newer insulin therapies."

According to Lilly, of the 3.5 million patients with diabetes using insulin in the United States, less than 2% will be affected by the discontinuations. Only about 2,000 people use the animal-based products.

Jerry Meece, R.Ph., of Plaza Pharmacy & Wellness Center in Gainesville, Texas, stated that none of his patients are taking these insulin products. "Because diabetes is a highly individualized disease, you are going to find some patients who will say that lente works better, but it's going to be a very small number of people."

Switching insulin treatments

For those pharmacists who still have patients on lente or ultralente insulin products, diabetes experts offer cautionary advice.

Patients may mistake the product discontinuation as a product recall and worry about safety, explained Judy Sommers-Hanson, Pharm.D., CDM, pharmacy care manager at Dominick's Pharmacy in Oakbrook, Ill. "Pharmacists will have to educate patients and help them learn about new products and why they have to change to a different therapy."

Changing patients from one insulin to another is not a simple process, contended Drab. "Some healthcare providers may presume that animal and human insulin therapies can be switched unit per unit," he noted. "That's not necessarily true. Typically, what I have noticed is when you switch from an animal insulin to a human insulin, you tend to require a little bit less insulin. Maybe 10 units or 15 units less are required."

When changing to another insulin, healthcare providers have a choice of several insulin analogs. Until Levemir reaches pharmacy stores, the only long-acting basal insulin analog available is Lantus (insulin glargine, Sanofi-Aventis).

Before Lantus, most patients took two injections of NPH a day as their basal insulin. Now, however, with a long-acting insulin like Lantus, basal insulins can be identified more accurately and initial dosing is simplified. Studies show that Lantus is more consistent and predictable in action than regular insulin, NPH, lente, or ultralente insulin. And it works in many patients over a 24-hour period, eliminating the need for multiple injections.

Understanding variability

Studies have shown that blood glucose control is more predictable with the newer insulin analogs. This translates into reliable blood glucose responses for patients and better diabetes control.

Extensive research has compared long-acting insulin analog Levemir against NPH. In one study of 408 patients with Type 1 diabetes, fasting blood glucose significantly improved in those taking Levemir compared with NPH-treated patients.

In another study, 54 adults with Type 1 diabetes received four single doses—calculated on body weight —of Levemir, Lantus, or NPH insulin on four identical study days in a clinical research center. Levemir was associated with significantly less within-subject variability—the blood glucose response to a given dose—than the other two agents.

Before Levemir is available, Apidra will make its debut nearly a year and a half since it was approved. Its manufacturers delayed the launch until the OptiClick pen delivery device was available in sufficient quantity.

Twice-daily injections of Apidra, given with NPH, provided small improvements in glycemic control compared with regular human insulin in patients with Type 2 diabetes, according to one study.

Another study of nearly 900 patients found that Apidra worked faster and had a shorter duration of action than regular human insulin. Whereas regular human insulin has to be administered 30 to 45 minutes before meals because of its relatively slow onset of action, Apidra can be given 15 minutes before or within 20 minutes after starting a meal. This provides patients greater convenience and requires less mealtime planning. In comparison with other rapid-acting insulin analogs, Apidra appears to be similar in terms of reducing A1C levels.

Inhalable insulin

Apidra and other rapid-acting injectables will likely be competing with a needle-free version in the near future. The inhaled insulin Exubera cleared another hurdle when the FDA's Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs advisory committee voted 8-1 to approve the dry powder form of insulin. They concluded there was sufficient clinical trial evidence that the product can be effectively used for intensive control of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes.

The novel insulin therapy has been studied in more than 3,500 patients. Studies have shown that inhaled insulin is effective in diabetes patients and provides glycemic control comparable to traditional insulin regimens.

The committee was divided on the issue of Exubera's effect on pulmonary function. Previous concerns about the therapy's long-term effects on pulmonary toxicity early in the drug's development led to several studies. Two one-year studies found improved glucose control with no pulmonary dysfunction. However, some committee members stated that more studies were needed in patients with interstitial lung disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and asthma.

The committee also voiced concern about the new inhalation delivery system, which has been described by some experts as awkward to use. It was suggested that training programs for physicians and patients be developed on how to properly use the device to ensure that patients inhale the correct amount of insulin to control their glucose levels.

Paul Wynn is a pharmacy writer based in Brooklyn, N.Y.



 E-Mail to a colleague
A new resource for time-starved physicians and healthcare professionals
Modern Medicine - Click Here
Search
Return to Topic Area:
Welcome Page
 


Privacy Policy Disclaimer Copyright Editorial Policy Sponsorship Policy All Topics
   Powered by Mediwire

 Sponsor:



 Bookstore
WellnessBooks.com - Books on Chronic Illness


 Sponsor


We subscribe to the HONcode principles of the Health On the Net FoundationWe subscribe to the HONcode principles of the Health On the Net Foundation   Visit WellnessBooks.com »
Home | Diseases & Conditions | Videos | Forums & Chat | Resources | Newsletter | Bookstore | Join
What's New | Submit Site | Donate | HW Shop | Advertise | About Us | Email | Search
Link to HealingWell
 
Privacy Policy & Disclaimer. ©1996-2005 HealingWell.com  All rights reserved.