With Alzheimer's disease (AD), researchers are playing "beat the clock." The population over age 85—who have the greatest
risk of AD—has become the fastest-growing demographic. It is thought that as many as 14 million Americans could be afflicted
with AD by 2050, unless researchers can figure a way to intervene. Not surprisingly, several drugmakers are rising to the
challenge. But the challenge is proving far from simple as researchers struggle to understand the etiology and pathogenesis
of the disease.
Barry Reisberg, M.D., professor of psychiatry at the New York University School of Medicine and clinical director of NYU's
William & Sylvia Silberstein Institute for Aging and Dementia, commented, "We don't know the cause of Alzheimer's disease.
From a clinical perspective, in terms of my own work, Alzheimer's disease reverses the course of normal human development
in remarkable ways. That's true not only in terms of the functional progression of the disease but also cognitively and in
terms of neurological reflexes. And why this is the case is still something of a mystery."
AD, a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, is the most common cause of dementia. Over a period of three to 20 years from
its onset, it affects an increasing number of nerve cells, impacting learning, memory, thinking, judgment, behavior, and finally
control and coordination of movement. AD ultimately leads to death. Treatments thus far approved by the Food & Drug Administration
only slow the progression of the disease. Reisberg underscored, "Nothing we have stops the progression of the disease"—but
the operative word in looking at the number of drugs in trials may well be yet.
 Drugs in the pipeline for AD
|
"Several strategies are being pursued in terms of the etiopathogenesis of the process," said Reisberg. "There are those who
believe this is a disease caused by the plaques with beta-amyloid, there are those who still believe this is a disease caused
by the neurofibrillary tangles, but there are many people who believe these are secondary phenomenon." Some believe the plaques
and tangles are secondary to oxidative stress or to heavy metal toxicity. Selected drugs currently in development and their
mechanisms of action are shown in the table.
Two drugs, in phase III trials at press time, target beta-amyloid, a known pathology of AD that leads to a buildup of plaque.
If these drugs prove successful and attain FDA approval, they are expected to dramatically alter the AD market.
Decision Resources, a leading research and advisory firm, predicts the launch of Alzhemed (NC-758, Neurochem) and Flurizan
(MPC-7869, flurbiprofen, Myriad Genetics) will be the primary drivers that grow the dementia treatment market by 11% annually
over the next 10 years. Decision Resources also predicts their advent will reshape the market, with the acetylcholinesterase
inhibitors, including donepezil (Aricept, Eisai), rivastigmine (Exelon, Novartis), galantamine (Razadyne, Janssen Pharmaceutica),
and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist memantine (Namenda, Forest Laboratories), declining significantly between 2009
and 2014.
In clinical trials, both Alzhemed and Flurizan appear to offer an advantage over existing therapy. Data suggest each drug
may be able to improve cognitive function, though improvement, measured by some scales, is small. Alzhemed has been demonstrated
to have a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on both the deposition of cerebrovascular beta-amyloid and its plasma concentration.
Flurizan is the first in a class of drugs known as selective amyloid beta-42-lowering agent (SALAs). Data from a phase II
follow-on study of Flurizan in patients with mild AD presented at the November 2005 Society for Neuroscience meeting in Washington,
D.C., showed participants improved as a group, regaining cognitive ability in 12 to 18 months.
There is also some research in treating the behavioral symptoms that accompany AD, but research to date suggests only a need
for better treatment. At present, no antipsychotic therapies are specifically approved for use in AD, yet their use is fairly
common. Recently, based on clinical evidence, the FDA mandated that atypical antipsychotic drug labeling contain a black box
warning that elderly patients with dementia-related psychoses treated with atypical antipsychotics are at increased risk of
death compared with those treated with placebo. However, at least one group feels this warning should also be extended to
conventional antipsychotics.
Based on their analysis, published in the Dec. 1, 2005, issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, Philip Wang, M.D., Ph.D., and associates concluded that conventional antipsychotic drugs are at least as likely as atypical
drugs to increase the risk of death among elderly persons and should not be used to replace atypical agents discontinued in
response to the FDA warning.
Wang, assistant professor of psychiatry and healthcare policy, Harvard Medical School, elaborated, "Just because the FDA didn't
include conventional antipsychotics in its advisory, there should not be an assumption that the conventional antipsychotics
are somehow free of risk. Our data don't support that. Exactly how much risk there is—ideally you really want a trial."
Wang and his associates analyzed mortality data for patients aged 65 and older (via a Pennsylvania drug insurance benefit
database) in multiple ways in an attempt to eliminate confounding factors. Still, even after ruling out several confounding
factors, they found that individuals with dementia had a 29% greater relative risk of death within 180 days after beginning
conventional antipsychotic therapy than did those treated with atypical antipsychotic therapy.
Wang hopes this analysis will prompt clinicians to use great care when antipsychotic therapy is required by elderly patients.
He stated, "Whatever the decision process is between a clinician and the family to the extent they can participate, there
has to be this weighing of whatever the risks are against the desired benefits. As long as there's that careful thought, that's
the direction you'd hope everyone goes in."
The clock is ticking. How best to prevent or treat AD? How can we intervene before the AD population explodes? With the research
currently in process, the next decade promises to be exciting.
THE AUTHOR is a clinical writer based in Indiana.